![]() ![]() Around 10 years ago the European Suzuki Association took up the question: use the Nachez version for its pedagogical value, or something closer to the original, for historical and stylistic reasons? They ultimately agreed to a compromise: they offer teachers the option to use a baroque version. I'm not the only teacher to debate the two versions and to feel like there is validity in both. ![]() In my opinion, Vivaldi's original notes and bowings allow for a deeper exploration of Baroque style - and also a faster speed limit (i.e. Mastering the challenging music helps push them to a new level of playing, and going through this process helps give them tools and confidence for learning difficult passages in the future.īut after they have conquered the challenge I always do let them in on the "secret" - I show them the other version, and sometimes we even listen to a recording of it in the lesson. In order to memorize it, we talk about how to look for the harmonic changes, sequences and important notes. In order to learn to play the fast-passage notes fluently, students usually need to practice playing the passage in various rhythmic patterns. As a teacher, I continue to use the Nachez version for pedagogical reasons - it presents challenge. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |